If you’ve followed Australian politics or media over the past few years, you’ve likely come across the name David Sharaz. He’s best known publicly as the husband of Brittany Higgins. Still, Sharaz also has a professional background in media, political communications and crisis management fields that sit right at the centre of Canberra’s public life. In this article, we’ll look at who David Sharaz is, what’s known about his career, how he became a figure in a national conversation and why his story intersects with Australia’s broader debates about media power, online commentary and defamation law.
Who is David Sharaz?
David Sharaz is an Australian communications and media professional. He has been linked publicly to work across areas like broadcast media, political communications and public relations (PR). In early 2025, he was publicly reported as taking on a senior role at a PR agency. Many Australians first heard his name because he is the husband of Brittany Higgins, who has been central to one of the biggest political and legal stories in modern Australia.
Why David Sharaz became a public figure in Australia
There are several key reasons Sharaz entered the public spotlight.
Marriage to Brittany Higgins
Australian media reported that Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz got married on the Gold Coast on 2 June 2024. Because Higgins’s story was already a major national news topic, Sharaz’s name was often mentioned in related coverage.
Involvement in court-related reporting
Sharaz has also been in the news due to legal proceedings connected to defamation matters and financial outcomes reported by major outlets.
Career in communications and public relations
In March 2025, multiple Australian media outlets reported that Sharaz joined Third Hemisphere as a director.
Career background: from media to political communications
While some personal details about Sharaz aren’t widely reported in mainstream profiles, his professional background is referenced across reputable Australian media and industry sources.
Work in broadcast media and journalism
Sharaz has been described in industry coverage as having worked across Australian media experience that typically involves fast-moving news cycles, message discipline and dealing with public scrutiny. Mumbrella and B&T both summarise his career as spanning broadcast media and political communications, including time connected to the Canberra press environment.
Government and press gallery experience
A notable part of Sharaz’s profile is the blend of media and government-facing roles. Trade reporting notes experience that includes media advisory work and involvement with political communication skills that often translate directly into reputation and issues management. This matters for Australians because the line between media, politics and PR is famously porous in Canberra. People who move between those worlds tend to understand how narratives form and how quickly they can spiral.
Director role at Third Hemisphere
In 2025, Sharaz was publicly reported as joining Third Hemisphere, a PR agency, as a director. The agency’s own “About” page also lists him as a director.
From an Australian audience perspective, this move makes sense on paper: journalism plus political comms is a classic pipeline into strategic PR, particularly work involving government, policy, or high-stakes public issues.
Relationship with Brittany Higgins
Sharaz’s name became far more widely known as the Higgins story grew into a national political crisis, spawning investigations, intense media coverage and multiple court matters.
Marriage in 2024
Higgins and Sharaz married on the Gold Coast in late May 2024, widely reported at the time in Australian media.
Moving to France
Media coverage also reported the couple leaving Australia to live in France, framing the move as a step away from the ongoing spotlight and online attention that surrounded their situation.
For many Australians watching from the outside, that period underscored something uncomfortable but real: once a story becomes national news, it can become nearly impossible for the people involved to “go back to normal” even years later.
Why David Sharaz’s story matters to Australians
Even if you’re not closely following every legal development, Sharaz’s public profile sits at the intersection of several uniquely Australian pressures:
1) The Canberra media politics ecosystem
Australia’s national politics is unusually concentrated: one city, one press gallery culture and a relatively small network of key media and political actors. Careers often cross between journalism, advisory roles and PR.
2) The power of online commentary
The Reynolds proceedings, as reported, highlight a reality many Australians underestimate: posts made in frustration can become central evidence in expensive litigation.
3) Defamation law as a real-world force
Academic commentary on the Reynolds vs Higgins dispute has used the case to illustrate how Australian defamation law operates in practice, especially around what must be proven, what defences succeed and the high cost of fighting.
4) Living in public after a national scandal
Australians have watched, in real time, how a single event can expand into years of litigation, media coverage, commentary and reputational damage affecting not only the central figures but also those close to them.
What we do and don’t know about David Sharaz personally
Because Sharaz’s profile is heavily shaped by media and legal coverage, a lot of reporting focuses on events, not personal biography. Outside of professional summarise and public reporting, many private details (family background, childhood specifics etc.) aren’t consistently documented in mainstream sources.
Conclusion
David Sharaz’s public profile serves as a reminder of how quickly life can change when private circumstances intersect with national politics and how the Australian media and legal environment can transform that collision into years of intense scrutiny.
For Australian readers, the “why” behind the interest is clear: his story sits at the junction of Canberra, media narratives, legal accountability and the permanent echo of online commentary themes that keep showing up in public life here, no matter which side of politics you sit on.
