Ben Aulich, a familiar name in Canberra’s legal circles, has carved out a reputation as a criminal defence lawyer and the leader of his own firm. His career has been marked by high-profile cases, professional accomplishments and inevitably, legal challenges that have sparked public discussion. This article examines his history, legal career, recent disciplinary actions, current legal issues and the implications of his story for Australian legal practitioners and the general public.
Who is Ben Aulich?
Ben Aulich is an Australian criminal defence lawyer based in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (ACT). He has spent much of his legal career specialising in serious criminal law and has been recognised for his skill in defending clients across a broad range of criminal and traffic matters. Aulich was admitted to practice law in 2000 and spent many years building his reputation in criminal law before founding his own firm, Aulich & Associates, dedicated to criminal defence work. His practice has a reputation for handling serious cases, encompassing drug trafficking, murder, traffic violations, and other high-profile legal battles.
A career in criminal law
Over the years, Aulich established himself as a determined advocate for those caught in the grip of the criminal justice system. His Canberra-based firm was renowned for its straightforward approach to defending clients’ rights, providing strong representation while also educating clients about their legal entitlements. Many Australians might recognise his name not only from court appearances but also from media reports covering the cases he worked on. Before the recent uproar, Aulich was known as one of Canberra’s foremost criminal lawyers.
Professional Misconduct and Tribunal Findings
Ben Aulich’s professional journey, despite its length, hasn’t been without its share of contentious moments. In June 2024, the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (ACAT) determined that Aulich had engaged in professional misconduct. This ruling was a direct result of his behaviour during a firm retreat held in February 2021.
Key Findings by ACAT
The tribunal’s ruling included the following points:
- Inappropriate conduct: During a professional development weekend with thirteen firm employees, Aulich participated in a drinking game where he removed his pants, which the tribunal said could have led to accidental exposure.
- Bawdy behaviour: On the same weekend, Aulich performed a shirtless, cabaret-style dance around a campfire, wearing suspenders and holding a rose between his teeth. The tribunal described this behaviour as “bawdy”.
- Failure to intervene: A demeaning, sexualised colouring book circulated among employees the next day. While Aulich did not create it, the tribunal found he failed to confiscate it or stop its distribution.
Penalty and Repercussions
As a result of these findings:
- Aulich was fined $20,000.
- He received a public reprimand.
- He was ordered to pay the Law Society’s legal costs.
Loss of practising certificate and exit from firm leadership
Following the tribunal decision, the ACT Law Society chose not to renew Aulich’s practising certificate. This effectively meant that he could no longer act as a solicitor in the ACT and exit from his leadership role at the firm that bore his name. The firm’s leadership, following Aulich’s exit, shifted to other partners, who promptly reassured clients that all legal affairs would be handled with the same level of professionalism.
Ongoing legal issues: Money laundering allegations
In August 2024, he was ordered to face trial in the ACT Supreme Court. The charges centre on Aulich’s alleged participation in a money laundering operation and his purported recruitment of others into criminal enterprises. Court filings indicate that Aulich and accountant Michael Papandrea allegedly discussed setting up a supermarket. This, they believed, would provide a front for cleaning the proceeds from the sale of illegal cigarettes. Evidence presented during the committal hearing hinted that both conversational and documentary notes might link them to the planning. Aulich maintains his innocence, pleading not guilty. The trial is still underway, and this legal matter is still pending, according to the most recent reports.
What does this mean for Australians?
The Ben Aulich case, unfolding in Canberra, has implications that extend far beyond the courtroom. A more thorough examination of professional behaviour, the responsibilities of senior lawyers, and the systems that govern and oversee legal professionals in Australia is needed. For the average Australian, the case highlights:
- Maintaining high professional standards is a fundamental principle in the legal profession.
- Regulatory bodies, such as the Law Society and ACAT, are responsible for upholding ethical standards.
- The open nature of legal proceedings and their influence on the public’s trust in the justice system are important factors to consider.
Furthermore, media attention surrounding this particular case ignited public discourse concerning workplace dynamics, ethical conduct, and the interplay between personal actions and professional responsibilities, topics frequently encountered by Australians within the wider employment landscape.
Conclusion
Ben Aulich’s professional trajectory, encompassing several decades of prominent defence work, the establishment of his own criminal law practice, and representation in intricate legal matters, has been noteworthy. However, recent developments, including tribunal sanctions and criminal charges, have substantially impacted his professional reputation.
For Australians observing the evolution of legal and professional spheres, Aulich’s experience highlights the persistent importance of accountability, well-defined ethical guidelines, and the rule of law in preserving public confidence. Whether serving as a cautionary example or a catalyst for discussion regarding legal culture, Ben Aulich’s name will likely remain familiar to many Australians for the foreseeable future.
